New PMC, Technical Customer, EPCM and EPC — a 9-minute breakdown of the four delivery modelsPMC vs Technical Customer vs EPCM vs EPC Read it

Advisory & Project Recovery B1

Project audit: an independent picture in 3–5 weeks

Fixed price, fixed duration, specific output: the real completion date, the final cost forecast and a priority action plan. It is the shortest route to understanding what is happening on a project.

How it is bought

Format
Fixed-price express product
Duration
3–5 weeks
Fee
Fixed price per deliverable package
Who it is for
Investors and lenders — before a deal, or when a project is in doubt
Projects
3 projects

We reply within 1 business day. A commercial proposal follows within 5 business days of the scoping meeting.

In substance

What this service is

The audit is INVECON's entry product. In 3–5 weeks we give the investor what they usually lack: an independent, documented picture of project status that does not depend on the participants' reporting. On that basis the client decides whether to continue, reinforce specific functions, or move to recovery management.

When you need this service

Dates are slipping and the explanations do not reconcile

Every party names a different cause and no consolidated picture exists.

The budget is growing for no clear reason

Additional works and cost increases appear continuously and there is no final cost forecast.

The investor does not trust the reporting

Status comes from the parties accountable for it, with no independent verification.

A change of manager or contractor is being considered

The factual position — quantities, money, contracts, quality — must be established first.

An entry into or acquisition of the project is planned

Real status and risk must be assessed before the investment decision.

A lender requires an independent assessment

The bank needs an opinion from a party with no role in delivery.

What we do

Schedule analysis and date forecast

Schedule quality assessed, actual status reconstructed, critical path calculated and a defensible completion date produced.

Budget analysis and cost forecast

Plan, actual and committed cost reconciled, outstanding quantities assessed, Cost to Complete and final cost forecast calculated.

Technical review of design and estimates

Documentation completeness and quality checked; solutions likely to cause cost growth or rework identified.

Contract review

With First in Law we analyse the contract structure: risk allocation, liability mechanisms and grounds for claims.

Sample quality checks on site

Sample verification of executed works, quantities and the state of site records.

Stabilisation roadmap

A priority action list with assessed benefit, owners and dates.

Deliverables

Deliverables

The specific documents, reports and management products that remain with the client.

  • Independent statement on project status
  • Justified forecast of the real completion date
  • Final cost forecast and Cost to Complete
  • Register of identified risks with impact assessment
  • Opinion on design documentation and estimates
  • Opinion on the contract structure
  • Report on sample quality and quantity checks
  • Project stabilisation roadmap

Client outcomes

Certainty instead of versions

One verifiable picture replaces a set of contradictory explanations.

A basis for a management decision

Continue, reinforce, or move to recovery — the decision rests on calculation.

Fast and fixed-price

3–5 weeks at a known cost: the audit does not become open-ended consulting.

An immediately usable plan

The roadmap contains actions for the coming weeks, not general recommendations.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Not answered here? Write to us and we will respond on your case.

3–5 weeks, depending on asset scale, the number of contracts, documentation availability and whether on-site quality verification is required.

The schedule and budget in whatever form they exist, design and construction contracts, payment certificates, design documentation, project reporting and site access. Missing documents are themselves a diagnostic finding.

Both formats are possible. An open audit is more effective because it grants access to data and site. A closed format is used when preparing for a dispute or a change of contractor.

The client takes one of three decisions: continue with the roadmap corrections; buy discrete functions as a Managed Service; or move to Project Recovery or a full Technical Customer contract.

No. The audit is a standalone fixed-price product. The opinion belongs to the client regardless of whether the engagement continues.

Related services

Shall we discuss your project?

Tell us about the asset and the current stage — we will propose a working format and team composition. A commercial proposal follows within five business days of the meeting.

We reply within 1 business day. A commercial proposal follows within 5 business days of the scoping meeting.